This cartoon is hilarious because a fish stick is a processed food product that does not, in fact, resemble any living fish.
Much like Jeffy is a processed cartoon stereotype that does not, in fact, resemble any living child.
Saturday, June 6, 2009
Friday, June 5, 2009
Marmaduke: You are not bringing home one of those!
No, children, don't cry. The grotesque parrot-creature in the window only looks that way cause Marmaduke's so darn big!
Beetle Bailey: Who gave you the flowers?
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Arlo and Janis: I'll do all I can to positively influence events.
While the poor artwork in Marmaduke and The Family Circus provides ample ammunition for mockery, it doesn't really prevent their authors from telling the kind of stories they want to tell, mostly because the stories they want to tell are so simple. The less than laudable artwork in Pearls Before Swine and xkcd, meanwhile, is actually something of a feature; it's interesting, and often humorous, to see what Pastis and Munroe can do within their artistic limitations. The drawing in Arlo and Janis, though, is a real hindrance.
Jimmy Johnson's strip is mostly daily gag stuff, but it occasionally involves a reasonably complex continuing storyline, along the lines of a less involved For Better or For Worse or 9 Chickweed Lane. It's not a particularly great comic, but the serialized storytelling is pretty decent. The drawing really drags it down, though. As the above installment indicates, the style of the strip is pretty simple and minimalistic. Beyond that, the characters just aren't very expressive, and that's the real problem.
The conversation taking place between Janis and Gus is pretty serious, and the writing does a decent job of conveying the gravity of the situation. But Johnson isn't able to convey that same seriousness in his artwork. On the contrary, Janis and Gus are so stiff and expressionless that they may as well be in a Pearls Before Swine. And in a story like this, in which the characters should be wearing their emotions on their sleeves, that just doesn't work.
A big part of readers' connection to the characters in For Better or For Worse was image-based. Even without words, the characters' emotions were clear. The drawing in 9 Chickweed Lane is quite a bit more inventive than Lynn Johnston's ever was, but, still, what really gives readers a connection to it is that expressiveness in characters' faces. Johnson's characters don't have that, and it's the biggest reason why Arlo and Janis isn't a very good comic strip.
Jimmy Johnson's strip is mostly daily gag stuff, but it occasionally involves a reasonably complex continuing storyline, along the lines of a less involved For Better or For Worse or 9 Chickweed Lane. It's not a particularly great comic, but the serialized storytelling is pretty decent. The drawing really drags it down, though. As the above installment indicates, the style of the strip is pretty simple and minimalistic. Beyond that, the characters just aren't very expressive, and that's the real problem.
The conversation taking place between Janis and Gus is pretty serious, and the writing does a decent job of conveying the gravity of the situation. But Johnson isn't able to convey that same seriousness in his artwork. On the contrary, Janis and Gus are so stiff and expressionless that they may as well be in a Pearls Before Swine. And in a story like this, in which the characters should be wearing their emotions on their sleeves, that just doesn't work.
A big part of readers' connection to the characters in For Better or For Worse was image-based. Even without words, the characters' emotions were clear. The drawing in 9 Chickweed Lane is quite a bit more inventive than Lynn Johnston's ever was, but, still, what really gives readers a connection to it is that expressiveness in characters' faces. Johnson's characters don't have that, and it's the biggest reason why Arlo and Janis isn't a very good comic strip.
Marmaduke: Marm, I wasn't done lecturing you.
Oh, kids, don't be freaked out by Dottie's frighteningly skeletal fingers. They're only like that cause Marmaduke's so darn big!
Family Circus: Mommy, was tonight gonna be a bath night?
This cartoon is hilarious because Jeffy has finally snapped. Having already killed his siblings and buried them in the back yard, he is now luring his unsuspecting mother to the doorway. Don't go to him, Thel! Don't do it!
Ziggy: I never express my opinions...I don't want them moving my strip to the editorial page!
Ziggy's lying, of course. He spouts bland populist talking points all the time, just like the characters in Pluggers and Shoe and The Family Circus. And that's fine! Cartoonists have every right to express their opinions. It would be nice, though, if they would acknowledge what they're doing.
With the exception of Pluggers, these cartoons all have more going on than the political, but the political is still there. Populism, after all, is a political position.
With the exception of Pluggers, these cartoons all have more going on than the political, but the political is still there. Populism, after all, is a political position.
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Drabble: Alex Trebek is very handsome, isn't he?
Marmaduke: I recently discovered one of my arms is longer than the other.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Mother Goose and Grimm: I like Doris Kearns Goodwin.
I take my enjoyment of his comic to mean that what the comics section needs is more Doris Kearns Goodwin and less gratuitous squirrel butt.
Cleats: It's not just any soccer ball, Jack. It's a Miley Cyrus soccer ball.
Rubes, Close to Home and Strange Brew: Internal logic in single-panel cartoons.
While single-panel cartoons tend to work by accentuating the absurd, it is nevertheless necessary for them to have a certain internal logic. Take Sunday's Rubes, for example. The premise of the cartoon is the old adage that a man's home is his castle. Taken to absurd literalness, it makes perfect sense within the world of the comic that homes would therefore come under siege from Hagar the Horrible like raiders. It's ridiculous, but the joke flows naturally from the premise.
Yesterday's Close to Home, on the other hand, doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The premise is that it's easy to vacuum up toys. The joke is that this particular mother has a hung a sign up on her wall indicating what noises various toys make when they get vacuumed up. But it's not at all clear just why she would hang up such a sign. What use is it, after all, to know the noises various toys make when they get vacuumed up?
The logic in today's Strange Brew is even worse. The premise is the idea of keeping an eye on something. The joke is that the characters in the cartoon are eyes. But that makes no sense at all. If, after all, you were an eye, you wouldn't have an eye. So you wouldn't be able to keep your eye on anything. I suppose you could keep yourself on something, but that doesn't sound right. And so the cartoon isn't so much amusing as it is perplexing and stupid.
Yesterday's Close to Home, on the other hand, doesn't make a whole lot of sense. The premise is that it's easy to vacuum up toys. The joke is that this particular mother has a hung a sign up on her wall indicating what noises various toys make when they get vacuumed up. But it's not at all clear just why she would hang up such a sign. What use is it, after all, to know the noises various toys make when they get vacuumed up?
The logic in today's Strange Brew is even worse. The premise is the idea of keeping an eye on something. The joke is that the characters in the cartoon are eyes. But that makes no sense at all. If, after all, you were an eye, you wouldn't have an eye. So you wouldn't be able to keep your eye on anything. I suppose you could keep yourself on something, but that doesn't sound right. And so the cartoon isn't so much amusing as it is perplexing and stupid.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Family Circus: When I finish my homework, can I do something useless?
Ziggy: When you're sad and lonely, "trash day" can become a "fresh start."
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Pluggers: I put on half a pound last week!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)