Saturday, June 20, 2009
Get Fuzzy: pwned
Family Circus: Mommy helping Daddy get ready for church.
Mutts: I bark therefore I am.
Born Loser: When I was kid, my dad would make me clean the fish we caught.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Baby Blues: This is going to be the best show and tell ever!
Family Circus: Daddy on the golf course shooting out of the rough.
This comic is hilarious because Bill is teaching little Billy how to be an ethical human being.
The Phantom: No one is "watching over us," girl! We're on our own.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Garfield: You're counting cake slices, aren't you?
That's today's Garfield. It is hilarious because Garfield likes to eat.
As bad as the comic strip is, though, it's nothing compared to what Jim Davis has let happen with the various Garfield tie-in projects. Take this, for example:
(via Batrock)
Stuff like the above might lead one to believe that Davis is a talentless hack who's only in cartooning for the money. And that's probably mostly true. But every once in a while he's capable of doing something good. To wit, this strip from just last week displays a remarkably solid understanding of animal behavior:
It was, of course, sandwiched between yet more "Garfield likes food" gags, so it reads as something of a fluke. Indeed, it's entirely possible that it's supposed to be a mere "Odie is an idiot" joke. But the fact remains that the comic is a perfect illustration of positive reinforcement. It would be nice if Davis focused more of his attention on similarly sharp observations, as Garfield is almost always at its strongest when Davis is treating his characters as animals, rather than as furry people.
For something better yet, take a look at this famous sequence of comics from 1989, in which we discover Garfield is dying or some such equally bizarre thing. It's really sort of brilliant and daring for a newspaper comic strip.
Of course, it would be more brilliant and daring if it weren't a direct rip-off of this far more impressive and moving Italian cartoon. (While Davis insists he hasn't seen the cartoon in question, that seems unlikely).
But, as this post here indicates, Davis has done other daring things with the Garfield character in a book called Garfield: His 9 Lives. I haven't actually gotten a chance to read the book, so I can't exactly attest to its quality, but Garfield apparently kills an old lady in it. So that's something.
Now that I'm at the end of it, I realize that this post is mostly just rambling nonsense. So in an attempt to retroactively add a vaguely positive thesis, I'll say this: I don't really like it when authors are overly precious about their work. Whatever else one might say about Davis, at least he doesn't have that problem.
As bad as the comic strip is, though, it's nothing compared to what Jim Davis has let happen with the various Garfield tie-in projects. Take this, for example:
(via Batrock)
Stuff like the above might lead one to believe that Davis is a talentless hack who's only in cartooning for the money. And that's probably mostly true. But every once in a while he's capable of doing something good. To wit, this strip from just last week displays a remarkably solid understanding of animal behavior:
It was, of course, sandwiched between yet more "Garfield likes food" gags, so it reads as something of a fluke. Indeed, it's entirely possible that it's supposed to be a mere "Odie is an idiot" joke. But the fact remains that the comic is a perfect illustration of positive reinforcement. It would be nice if Davis focused more of his attention on similarly sharp observations, as Garfield is almost always at its strongest when Davis is treating his characters as animals, rather than as furry people.
For something better yet, take a look at this famous sequence of comics from 1989, in which we discover Garfield is dying or some such equally bizarre thing. It's really sort of brilliant and daring for a newspaper comic strip.
Of course, it would be more brilliant and daring if it weren't a direct rip-off of this far more impressive and moving Italian cartoon. (While Davis insists he hasn't seen the cartoon in question, that seems unlikely).
But, as this post here indicates, Davis has done other daring things with the Garfield character in a book called Garfield: His 9 Lives. I haven't actually gotten a chance to read the book, so I can't exactly attest to its quality, but Garfield apparently kills an old lady in it. So that's something.
Now that I'm at the end of it, I realize that this post is mostly just rambling nonsense. So in an attempt to retroactively add a vaguely positive thesis, I'll say this: I don't really like it when authors are overly precious about their work. Whatever else one might say about Davis, at least he doesn't have that problem.
Family Circus: Daddy showing me how to use my skateboard.
This cartoon is hilarious because little Billy has grabbed the skateboard out from underneath his father and is taking great pleasure in the pain he has inflicted. While this might seem sociopathic, it's hard for me to be too judgmental given what we have learned about the Keane parents over the past two days.
An even more disturbing possibility, of course, is that those last couple of cartoons were nothing more than anti-Bill and Thel propaganda designed to turn the audience against them and curry favor for little Billy's sadistic "revenge." At this point, nothing would surprise me.
An even more disturbing possibility, of course, is that those last couple of cartoons were nothing more than anti-Bill and Thel propaganda designed to turn the audience against them and curry favor for little Billy's sadistic "revenge." At this point, nothing would surprise me.
Candorville: I like cheese.
Candorville is another one of those politically oriented comic strips that's at its best when it's not actually focusing on politics. Today's installment is funny because it has a well constructed joke that plays off of established character traits and relationships. While I'm not averse to cartoonists using their strip as a platform to give voice to their opinions, they really need to keep those opinions ancillary to the more narratively useful elements.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Family Circus: Daddy fixing the Snack Machine that didn't work.
Shoe: How'd your garage sale go?
Beetle Bailey: They're keeping her overnight for observation.
Dog Eat Doug: CLICK!!!
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Family Circus: Mommy and Daddy talking about money.
Mark Trail: These are just pictures of a lot of drums...why are you saying they belong to my company?
The second panel clearly indicates that Mark is capable of telepathy. This must be how he is able to emphasize the first letter in each of the words in Williams Chemical Company.
It's also nice of him to spell it all out so clearly so the woman can understand. She may be the president of a company, but her inferior sex is surely consistent with a deficient intellect.
It's also nice of him to spell it all out so clearly so the woman can understand. She may be the president of a company, but her inferior sex is surely consistent with a deficient intellect.
Pearls Before Swine: Pig, Pig, Pig...Dinosaurs and humans never lived together. Their existence was separated by millions of years.
Goat has clearly never been to the Creation Museum.
In all seriousness, that place looks like the greatest satire of creationism ever. If only it were satire.
In all seriousness, that place looks like the greatest satire of creationism ever. If only it were satire.
Shoe: Theater Review
Dog Eat Doug: They were singing?
The Phantom: A criminal stops to help an injured motorist? No way!
Monday, June 15, 2009
Candorville: *@$% yeah, I'm feelin' Lost.
Too Much Coffee Man: You're very nice but I'm still going to eat you.
Lola and Strange Brew: Hey, pal! Could you keep it down?
Family Circus: Little Billy fills in with his observations while Daddy takes the week off.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Big Nate: ...I guess first I'd have to have a cell phone!
Baldo and Luann: OK, the TV stays off.
Here's the thing. It's not actually the case that television is an inherently inferior medium as compared to all other media. And it's hardly the case that Lost is an inferior narrative as compared to Gone with the Wind. It's not even the case that reading a book is an anymore inherently valuable activity as compared to other activities. There are lots of books that are every bit as trashy as Desperate Housewives. Gone with the Wind might even be one of them.
But all these assumptions do make for easy jokes, so you see this kind of thing a lot.
But all these assumptions do make for easy jokes, so you see this kind of thing a lot.
Brewster Rockit and Monty: I think your machine is malfunctioning.
Both of these comics rely on fairly subtle, mostly image-based set-ups, and therefore actually require the reader to pay attention in order to completely get the jokes. This is an unfortunately rare occurrence in the comics section.
On another note, I've been meaning to write about Monty for a while now, but it's such an efficient, low-key sort of comic that it's often hard to find anything particularly interesting to say about it. But it's one of the better comic strips around, and you should probably read it.
On another note, I've been meaning to write about Monty for a while now, but it's such an efficient, low-key sort of comic that it's often hard to find anything particularly interesting to say about it. But it's one of the better comic strips around, and you should probably read it.
Rudy Park and Non Sequitur: You may commence with not bothering to twitter or learn anything more about it.
I know it's an easy joke and exists on the demon Internet and is solely responsible for the decline of civilization and all that, but one would think that newspaper cartoonists would be more hesitant to mock Twitter given that the medium in which they work is defined in large part by its stringent length limitations.
*Non Sequitur from June 13, 2009.
*Non Sequitur from June 13, 2009.